WEEK 1:

I started with a very personal  image:

{ a photo of my bedsheet }

I tried to translate it into a navigable 3D structure,treating modeling as a way to extend the information embedded in a photo.

Visual Practice：

WEEK 2:

This week, I focused on a small corner of my kitchen, right after I finished cooking.

I tried to trace back the cooking process — through oil stains, scattered noodles, and the positions of condiments.In doing so, I realised I wasn’t simply reconstructing a scene,

but reorganising the hidden structure of information behind the image.

Compared to the bed scene I explored earlier,the traces in the kitchen feel more temporal — they have sequence, rhythm, and direction.

These aren’t just static marks left behind.They are residues of action — something that was actively done.

Visual Practice：

I was extracting traces from the image, and generating a model from those marks.But the model — while built from the image — also started to lose something, like lighting,  composition —things that often don’t survive the transition into spatial form.

From Traces of Stillness to Traces of Action

This shift led me to reflect on how a model can generate structures and sequences that don’t exist in the original image.

When an image is translated into a 3D model,what kinds of information are preserved? What gets lost or newly created in that shift?

Is the model simply a visual extension of the image —or is it a completely new way of restructuring information into a different format?

KEEP GOING

——END——

Thanks for watching~

---